https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169918 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only where it arises from the same cause of action as an earlier suit and the omitted relief could have been claimed then. A prior proceeding seeking impleadment in execution and continuation of execution was held not to be a suit for possession on title and did not found the later possession claim. The earlier proceeding therefore did not trigger the bar, and the suit for possession of Schedule I properties was not barred under Order 2 Rule 2. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 16:21:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169918 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only where it arises from the same cause of action as an earlier suit and the omitted relief could have been claimed then. A prior proceeding seeking impleadment in execution and continuation of execution was held not to be a suit for possession on title and did not found the later possession claim. The earlier proceeding therefore did not trigger the bar, and the suit for possession of Schedule I properties was not barred under Order 2 Rule 2. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169918