https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169906 An arbitration award was found unsustainable where the arbitrator failed to consider the respondents' counterclaims, because both claim and counterclaim had to be dealt with before making an award; the remand for fresh consideration was upheld and the later review was set aside for lack of review grounds. The principles of res judicata, constructive res judicata, and Order 2 Rule 2 CPC were held applicable to arbitration proceedings, so claims arising from the same terminated contract that could have been raised earlier were barred in a later reference. The first award failed, the second reference and award were barred, and the High Court's decision was affirmed. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 14:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169906 An arbitration award was found unsustainable where the arbitrator failed to consider the respondents' counterclaims, because both claim and counterclaim had to be dealt with before making an award; the remand for fresh consideration was upheld and the later review was set aside for lack of review grounds. The principles of res judicata, constructive res judicata, and Order 2 Rule 2 CPC were held applicable to arbitration proceedings, so claims arising from the same terminated contract that could have been raised earlier were barred in a later reference. The first award failed, the second reference and award were barred, and the High Court's decision was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169906