https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169904 In a bail proceeding, the court must assess whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case, and weak or uncorroborated evidence cannot by itself justify continued custody. Co-accused confessional statements were treated as having limited value at the bail stage, and the alleged telephonic statement did not qualify as a dying declaration. The recovery of letters from the deceased's house did not show they had been brought to the appellant's notice, and the shifting explanation about alleged money payment was weakened by bank material showing the cash had been deposited. Bail was therefore warranted and the appellant's bail prayer succeeded. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 May 2024 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169904 In a bail proceeding, the court must assess whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case, and weak or uncorroborated evidence cannot by itself justify continued custody. Co-accused confessional statements were treated as having limited value at the bail stage, and the alleged telephonic statement did not qualify as a dying declaration. The recovery of letters from the deceased's house did not show they had been brought to the appellant's notice, and the shifting explanation about alleged money payment was weakened by bank material showing the cash had been deposited. Bail was therefore warranted and the appellant's bail prayer succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169904