<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 814 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169899</link>
    <description>A widowed daughter&#039;s limited interest under her father&#039;s will was held to be property taken in recognition of a pre-existing right to maintenance, so Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 enlarged the estate into absolute ownership. Although the will used restrictive language and contemplated reversion to the brothers, the decisive factor was that the daughter was a destitute dependent with a maintenance claim under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Section 14(2) did not apply because it is confined to a fresh grant creating a restricted estate without antecedent right. The court therefore treated the bequest as a maintenance-linked provision, not a new limited grant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 12:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 814 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169899</link>
      <description>A widowed daughter&#039;s limited interest under her father&#039;s will was held to be property taken in recognition of a pre-existing right to maintenance, so Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 enlarged the estate into absolute ownership. Although the will used restrictive language and contemplated reversion to the brothers, the decisive factor was that the daughter was a destitute dependent with a maintenance claim under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Section 14(2) did not apply because it is confined to a fresh grant creating a restricted estate without antecedent right. The court therefore treated the bequest as a maintenance-linked provision, not a new limited grant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>