https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169892 The Calcutta High Court's jurisdiction to entertain questions on the legality and enforceability of the arbitral award was upheld in light of the earlier proceedings and the forum selection clause. The jurisdictional objection had already been examined in prior proceedings before the Calcutta High Court and the Madras High Court, and the appellant had not successfully overturned the adverse orders. Because the same court had earlier exercised jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act, the forum clause supported continuation before that court. Reopening the jurisdictional issue was therefore unwarranted, and no basis for interference was made out. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 11:35:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169892 The Calcutta High Court's jurisdiction to entertain questions on the legality and enforceability of the arbitral award was upheld in light of the earlier proceedings and the forum selection clause. The jurisdictional objection had already been examined in prior proceedings before the Calcutta High Court and the Madras High Court, and the appellant had not successfully overturned the adverse orders. Because the same court had earlier exercised jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act, the forum clause supported continuation before that court. Reopening the jurisdictional issue was therefore unwarranted, and no basis for interference was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169892