https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169891 A notice of filing of an arbitral award issued by a court that had already been found to lack jurisdiction cannot validly trigger the limitation period for objections under Article 119(a) of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the objections were not time-barred. Section 31(4) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was treated as conferring exclusive seisin on the court first competent to entertain proceedings arising from the reference; where the Subordinate Court lacked jurisdiction and transfer had been directed, it could not sustain the award proceedings on its own notice. The objections were therefore required to be considered on merits by the High Court. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 11:20:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169891 A notice of filing of an arbitral award issued by a court that had already been found to lack jurisdiction cannot validly trigger the limitation period for objections under Article 119(a) of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the objections were not time-barred. Section 31(4) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was treated as conferring exclusive seisin on the court first competent to entertain proceedings arising from the reference; where the Subordinate Court lacked jurisdiction and transfer had been directed, it could not sustain the award proceedings on its own notice. The objections were therefore required to be considered on merits by the High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169891