<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 785 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the deletion of VSAT and lease line charges, while remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for verification and possible deduction of transaction charges based on the assessee&#039;s belief and past assessments. The Tribunal referred to precedents and held that VSAT and lease line charges were not for technical services, thus no tax deduction was required for those charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 20:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 785 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the deletion of VSAT and lease line charges, while remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for verification and possible deduction of transaction charges based on the assessee&#039;s belief and past assessments. The Tribunal referred to precedents and held that VSAT and lease line charges were not for technical services, thus no tax deduction was required for those charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>