<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that excise duty should not be included in the closing stock valuation unless the goods have been cleared, as excise duty liability crystallizes upon clearance, not manufacture. The decision was based on the interpretation that excise duty is not payable immediately upon production, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 15:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that excise duty should not be included in the closing stock valuation unless the goods have been cleared, as excise duty liability crystallizes upon clearance, not manufacture. The decision was based on the interpretation that excise duty is not payable immediately upon production, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s contention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>