<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1116 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they are not liable to pay interest on the previously paid differential duty without interest. The decision was based on the similarity of facts between the present case and a previous judgment, emphasizing the applicability of the earlier ruling in determining the liability for interest on the differential duty paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1116 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they are not liable to pay interest on the previously paid differential duty without interest. The decision was based on the similarity of facts between the present case and a previous judgment, emphasizing the applicability of the earlier ruling in determining the liability for interest on the differential duty paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>