<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259508</link>
    <description>An assessee claiming exemption as a vocational training institute established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery where it had consistently disclosed its activities to the Department. The material on record, including a letter from the Joint Commissioner, indicated that the institute appeared to fit within the exemption, and an earlier Board circular supported inclusion of foreign language training institutes within the exempt category. The later circular was treated as not reflecting the correct legal position on the facts noted. The record also raised a substantial prima facie doubt on wilful suppression, affecting the limitation objection. Complete waiver and stay were therefore granted pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 19:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259508</link>
      <description>An assessee claiming exemption as a vocational training institute established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery where it had consistently disclosed its activities to the Department. The material on record, including a letter from the Joint Commissioner, indicated that the institute appeared to fit within the exemption, and an earlier Board circular supported inclusion of foreign language training institutes within the exempt category. The later circular was treated as not reflecting the correct legal position on the facts noted. The record also raised a substantial prima facie doubt on wilful suppression, affecting the limitation objection. Complete waiver and stay were therefore granted pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>