<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 370 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259496</link>
    <description>Third-party resistance to execution of an eviction decree succeeds only if the objector shows a prima facie independent legal right or lawful sub-tenancy constituting just cause under Order 21 CPC; in the absence of documentary proof of sub-tenancy, rent receipts, or other supporting material, the alleged sub-tenancy is too vague to defeat execution. The note also states that a landlord-tenant eviction decree obtained by the Official Liquidator before the Company Court was competent, and a later ownership challenge did not displace it. A defect in the Executing Court&#039;s pecuniary jurisdiction does not invalidate enforcement where no prejudice is pleaded or shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 370 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259496</link>
      <description>Third-party resistance to execution of an eviction decree succeeds only if the objector shows a prima facie independent legal right or lawful sub-tenancy constituting just cause under Order 21 CPC; in the absence of documentary proof of sub-tenancy, rent receipts, or other supporting material, the alleged sub-tenancy is too vague to defeat execution. The note also states that a landlord-tenant eviction decree obtained by the Official Liquidator before the Company Court was competent, and a later ownership challenge did not displace it. A defect in the Executing Court&#039;s pecuniary jurisdiction does not invalidate enforcement where no prejudice is pleaded or shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>