<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 366 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified regarding the fair market value estimation and the year of taxability issues. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 366 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified regarding the fair market value estimation and the year of taxability issues. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>