<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 362 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259488</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow an additional ground challenging the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer before initiating proceedings under section 153-C of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the necessity of recorded satisfaction and dismissed the appeals, highlighting the mandatory nature of this requirement and the importance of procedural compliance in tax proceedings. The absence of such satisfaction vitiated the proceedings, underscoring the significance of meeting statutory prerequisites in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 06:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 362 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259488</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow an additional ground challenging the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer before initiating proceedings under section 153-C of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the necessity of recorded satisfaction and dismissed the appeals, highlighting the mandatory nature of this requirement and the importance of procedural compliance in tax proceedings. The absence of such satisfaction vitiated the proceedings, underscoring the significance of meeting statutory prerequisites in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>