<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 358 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the addition of Rs. 23,57,000/- made by the Assessing Officer, holding that the CIT (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition without sufficient evidence. The order pronounced on April 30, 2015, emphasized the need for proper substantiation and evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 06:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 358 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the addition of Rs. 23,57,000/- made by the Assessing Officer, holding that the CIT (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition without sufficient evidence. The order pronounced on April 30, 2015, emphasized the need for proper substantiation and evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>