<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the income of Rs. 1,76,03,581/- should be classified as short-term capital gains, not business income. The Portfolio Management Fees (PMS) were deemed not allowable as business expenditure due to the income classification. Additionally, the loss on trading of derivatives was accepted as a business loss rather than a speculative loss, allowing for set off against other income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all counts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 06:53:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the income of Rs. 1,76,03,581/- should be classified as short-term capital gains, not business income. The Portfolio Management Fees (PMS) were deemed not allowable as business expenditure due to the income classification. Additionally, the loss on trading of derivatives was accepted as a business loss rather than a speculative loss, allowing for set off against other income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all counts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>