<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 348 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of the penalty, requiring evidence of deliberate concealment, which was lacking in this case. The return of income was filed within the extended time allowed, and no deliberate concealment was established. Consequently, the penalty was not imposed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 20/4/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 348 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of the penalty, requiring evidence of deliberate concealment, which was lacking in this case. The return of income was filed within the extended time allowed, and no deliberate concealment was established. Consequently, the penalty was not imposed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 20/4/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>