<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 344 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Tax Authorities to reconsider the addition of Rs. 7,27,57,135 to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal directed a fresh assessment, emphasizing the need to determine the arm&#039;s length price by considering allocated expenses, evaluating the actual receipt and benefits of services, and justifying the choice of transfer pricing method. The Tribunal highlighted that the Tax Authorities should focus on determining the arm&#039;s length price based on comparable transactions rather than questioning the necessity of services. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 344 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Tax Authorities to reconsider the addition of Rs. 7,27,57,135 to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal directed a fresh assessment, emphasizing the need to determine the arm&#039;s length price by considering allocated expenses, evaluating the actual receipt and benefits of services, and justifying the choice of transfer pricing method. The Tribunal highlighted that the Tax Authorities should focus on determining the arm&#039;s length price based on comparable transactions rather than questioning the necessity of services. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>