<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 273 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169826</link>
    <description>Preventive detention conditions must satisfy Articles 14 and 21 and cannot make fundamental rights illusory. A restriction limiting a detenu to one monthly interview with family and friends was held excessive and arbitrary because personal liberty includes maintaining social contact subject to reasonable prison regulation; the detenu was entitled to at least two interviews a week. Restrictions on consultations with a legal adviser were also struck down because prior permission and the mandatory presence of a sponsoring officer were cumbersome and unreasonable. Consultation with counsel was to be allowed at a reasonable hour on appointment with the jail superintendent, without requiring the officer&#039;s presence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 273 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169826</link>
      <description>Preventive detention conditions must satisfy Articles 14 and 21 and cannot make fundamental rights illusory. A restriction limiting a detenu to one monthly interview with family and friends was held excessive and arbitrary because personal liberty includes maintaining social contact subject to reasonable prison regulation; the detenu was entitled to at least two interviews a week. Restrictions on consultations with a legal adviser were also struck down because prior permission and the mandatory presence of a sponsoring officer were cumbersome and unreasonable. Consultation with counsel was to be allowed at a reasonable hour on appointment with the jail superintendent, without requiring the officer&#039;s presence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>