<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 670 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169814</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for an industrial dispute reference depends on where a material part of the cause of action arises. The text explains that the termination dispute had a direct nexus with the transfer orders, and that service of the termination orders at Calcutta was legally significant because termination takes effect on communication. On that basis, a part of the cause of action arose in West Bengal, giving the State a sufficient territorial connection to make the reference. It also notes that the existence of another possible forum does not by itself defeat jurisdiction, and that territorial objections are technical unless prejudice or failure of justice is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 670 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169814</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for an industrial dispute reference depends on where a material part of the cause of action arises. The text explains that the termination dispute had a direct nexus with the transfer orders, and that service of the termination orders at Calcutta was legally significant because termination takes effect on communication. On that basis, a part of the cause of action arose in West Bengal, giving the State a sufficient territorial connection to make the reference. It also notes that the existence of another possible forum does not by itself defeat jurisdiction, and that territorial objections are technical unless prejudice or failure of justice is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>