https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169811 Promotee officers temporarily posted to cadre posts under administrative arrangements could not count the full period of ad hoc officiation for seniority; only officiation from the legally recognised date under the seniority rules was reckonable. The requirements of select list inclusion, UPSC approval, and appointment in accordance with the recruitment scheme were conditions of recruitment, not merely service conditions, and had to be strictly followed. No deemed relaxation arose from failure to prepare the select list annually or other administrative lapses, because relaxation required a conscious written decision. The differential treatment of regular recruits and temporary appointees did not violate Articles 14 or 16(1). en-us Fri, 20 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2015 11:08:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169811 Promotee officers temporarily posted to cadre posts under administrative arrangements could not count the full period of ad hoc officiation for seniority; only officiation from the legally recognised date under the seniority rules was reckonable. The requirements of select list inclusion, UPSC approval, and appointment in accordance with the recruitment scheme were conditions of recruitment, not merely service conditions, and had to be strictly followed. No deemed relaxation arose from failure to prepare the select list annually or other administrative lapses, because relaxation required a conscious written decision. The differential treatment of regular recruits and temporary appointees did not violate Articles 14 or 16(1). Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169811