<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169810</link>
    <description>In service integration under the States Reorganisation Act, allocated employees&#039; pre-existing promotion conditions could not be disadvantaged by applying another unit&#039;s rules that were never part of their original service regime. The text states that the State&#039;s 1964 directions did not create a new service rule by executive fiat, but corrected the improper use of Bombay rules against officers governed by different prior conditions. It also states that seniority could be fixed by comparing the nature, duties, powers, territorial responsibility and qualifications of the posts, and that placing the allocated Assistant Sales Tax Officers above the Bombay Sales Tax Inspectors was consistent with fair and equitable integration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 10:43:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169810</link>
      <description>In service integration under the States Reorganisation Act, allocated employees&#039; pre-existing promotion conditions could not be disadvantaged by applying another unit&#039;s rules that were never part of their original service regime. The text states that the State&#039;s 1964 directions did not create a new service rule by executive fiat, but corrected the improper use of Bombay rules against officers governed by different prior conditions. It also states that seniority could be fixed by comparing the nature, duties, powers, territorial responsibility and qualifications of the posts, and that placing the allocated Assistant Sales Tax Officers above the Bombay Sales Tax Inspectors was consistent with fair and equitable integration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>