<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 331 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259457</link>
    <description>Under the Pan Masala Packing Machine Rules, 2008, the first proviso to Rule 8 is explained as applying only when manufacture begins at a retail sale price falling in a different slab. The commentary reads Rule 5 and Rule 8 together to show that different prices within the same slab do not create a new retail sale price for additional machine liability. On that reading, the scheme avoids repeated levy on the same deemed production from the same packing machine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 331 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259457</link>
      <description>Under the Pan Masala Packing Machine Rules, 2008, the first proviso to Rule 8 is explained as applying only when manufacture begins at a retail sale price falling in a different slab. The commentary reads Rule 5 and Rule 8 together to show that different prices within the same slab do not create a new retail sale price for additional machine liability. On that reading, the scheme avoids repeated levy on the same deemed production from the same packing machine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>