https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259451 An order conclusively determining liability to pay dividends in an oppression and mismanagement context was treated as executable as a decree under the Code of Civil Procedure. The continuing withholding of dividends was regarded as a continuing wrong, so limitation did not bar execution while the default persisted. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII was confined to discovery of new matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason; attempts to reopen matters already decided were outside review. The article states that execution was maintainable and the review application failed. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2015 07:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259451 An order conclusively determining liability to pay dividends in an oppression and mismanagement context was treated as executable as a decree under the Code of Civil Procedure. The continuing withholding of dividends was regarded as a continuing wrong, so limitation did not bar execution while the default persisted. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII was confined to discovery of new matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason; attempts to reopen matters already decided were outside review. The article states that execution was maintainable and the review application failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259451