<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 317 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259443</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the appellate authority&#039;s decision. The judgment highlighted the incorrect application of clauses (a) and (b) of Explanation 5A to section 271(1) and clarified the voluntary nature of disclosure in the context of search and seizure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 07:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 317 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259443</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the appellate authority&#039;s decision. The judgment highlighted the incorrect application of clauses (a) and (b) of Explanation 5A to section 271(1) and clarified the voluntary nature of disclosure in the context of search and seizure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>