<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 314 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259440</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding suppressed production and gross profit rate. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply a gross profit rate of 23% for determining income from manufacturing, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence in assessing production figures. The Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on power consumption alone as insufficient and supported the Tribunal&#039;s approach of considering various factors in determining income. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 314 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259440</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding suppressed production and gross profit rate. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply a gross profit rate of 23% for determining income from manufacturing, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence in assessing production figures. The Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on power consumption alone as insufficient and supported the Tribunal&#039;s approach of considering various factors in determining income. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>