<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 309 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259435</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand a case due to the pendency of an appeal, emphasizing the binding nature of Special Bench decisions on smaller Benches. The Court instructed the Tribunal to redecide the issue within two months, with the option to follow or not follow the Special Bench decision, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal precedents and quasi-judicial discipline for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 07:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 309 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259435</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand a case due to the pendency of an appeal, emphasizing the binding nature of Special Bench decisions on smaller Benches. The Court instructed the Tribunal to redecide the issue within two months, with the option to follow or not follow the Special Bench decision, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal precedents and quasi-judicial discipline for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>