<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 303 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions by excluding certain comparables and considering only the relevant segments of others. The Tribunal also restored some issues back to the TPO for fresh consideration, particularly regarding the inclusion of certain comparables. The Tribunal dismissed some grounds as &quot;Not Pressed&quot; and directed the AO to address the tax computation errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 303 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions by excluding certain comparables and considering only the relevant segments of others. The Tribunal also restored some issues back to the TPO for fresh consideration, particularly regarding the inclusion of certain comparables. The Tribunal dismissed some grounds as &quot;Not Pressed&quot; and directed the AO to address the tax computation errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>