<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 302 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the stated value of international transactions of oil imports as the arm&#039;s length price, thereby deleting the Rs. 29,70,31,153 transfer pricing adjustment. The rejection of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method and reliance on broker price notes were key factors in the decision, making other grounds raised by the assessee moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 07:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 302 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the stated value of international transactions of oil imports as the arm&#039;s length price, thereby deleting the Rs. 29,70,31,153 transfer pricing adjustment. The rejection of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method and reliance on broker price notes were key factors in the decision, making other grounds raised by the assessee moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>