<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169808</link>
    <description>Central Excise appeals before the SC were dismissed both for delay and on merits, leaving the underlying adverse decision undisturbed. The order records no substantive legal reasoning beyond the dismissal, so the operative effect is limited to confirmation that the challenge failed on both procedural and merit grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 13:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169808</link>
      <description>Central Excise appeals before the SC were dismissed both for delay and on merits, leaving the underlying adverse decision undisturbed. The order records no substantive legal reasoning beyond the dismissal, so the operative effect is limited to confirmation that the challenge failed on both procedural and merit grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>