<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 299 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259425</link>
    <description>The court clarified that service tax was not applicable on buildings rented to a Government organization before July 2012. The petitioner, who paid the tax on behalf of the tenant, was advised to seek a refund after it was deemed wrongly deducted. The court emphasized cooperation between the landlord and tenant in pursuing the refund, rejecting the argument that the responsibility solely lay with the tenant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 299 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259425</link>
      <description>The court clarified that service tax was not applicable on buildings rented to a Government organization before July 2012. The petitioner, who paid the tax on behalf of the tenant, was advised to seek a refund after it was deemed wrongly deducted. The court emphasized cooperation between the landlord and tenant in pursuing the refund, rejecting the argument that the responsibility solely lay with the tenant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>