<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259419</link>
    <description>Processing natural sesame seeds by cleaning, grading, washing with caustic soda, drying and removing the upper layer to produce huld sesame was treated as manufacture under the Gujarat VAT Act because the operation created a distinct marketable and edible product with a real change in form, quality and use. On that basis, input tax credit was available, and the associated penalty and interest were not sustained. The Court distinguished Revenue authorities cited on the facts, as those cases did not involve a comparable transformation of the original commodity. The Tribunal&#039;s view was affirmed and the tax appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259419</link>
      <description>Processing natural sesame seeds by cleaning, grading, washing with caustic soda, drying and removing the upper layer to produce huld sesame was treated as manufacture under the Gujarat VAT Act because the operation created a distinct marketable and edible product with a real change in form, quality and use. On that basis, input tax credit was available, and the associated penalty and interest were not sustained. The Court distinguished Revenue authorities cited on the facts, as those cases did not involve a comparable transformation of the original commodity. The Tribunal&#039;s view was affirmed and the tax appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>