https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259413 Blast furnace gas cleared as a by-product and exempt from excise duty under Notification No. 76/86 did not warrant reversal of credit or payment under Rule 57AD(2)(b) where the dispute was already governed by binding Supreme Court authority. The Tribunal applied that precedent and held the refund claim maintainable, rejecting the Revenue's challenge. The appellate challenge accordingly failed, and the cross-objection was disposed of on the same basis. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 May 2015 19:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259413 Blast furnace gas cleared as a by-product and exempt from excise duty under Notification No. 76/86 did not warrant reversal of credit or payment under Rule 57AD(2)(b) where the dispute was already governed by binding Supreme Court authority. The Tribunal applied that precedent and held the refund claim maintainable, rejecting the Revenue's challenge. The appellate challenge accordingly failed, and the cross-objection was disposed of on the same basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259413