<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 284 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259410</link>
    <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order on pre-deposit regarding Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) by considering the excess payment made by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s payment exceeding the final ADD amount was acknowledged, leading to a directive that a portion of the payment should be appropriated towards ADD, with the balance for customs duty. The appellant was further directed to deposit an additional amount towards duty liability to comply with the modified pre-deposit order. The Court waived the pre-deposit of the remaining amount demanded pending the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s excess payment towards ADD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 284 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259410</link>
      <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order on pre-deposit regarding Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) by considering the excess payment made by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s payment exceeding the final ADD amount was acknowledged, leading to a directive that a portion of the payment should be appropriated towards ADD, with the balance for customs duty. The appellant was further directed to deposit an additional amount towards duty liability to comply with the modified pre-deposit order. The Court waived the pre-deposit of the remaining amount demanded pending the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s excess payment towards ADD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>