https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259383 The court concluded that the Petitioner was entitled to the balance reward amount as the information provided by the Petitioner was crucial in the successful seizure of goods and subsequent revenue generation. The court criticized the Respondents for delaying the reward and emphasized the importance of adhering to the Reward Policy to encourage informers. The court directed the Respondents to pay the Petitioner the balance reward as per the Reward Policy within three months, after adjusting the advance amount already paid. en-us Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259383 The court concluded that the Petitioner was entitled to the balance reward amount as the information provided by the Petitioner was crucial in the successful seizure of goods and subsequent revenue generation. The court criticized the Respondents for delaying the reward and emphasized the importance of adhering to the Reward Policy to encourage informers. The court directed the Respondents to pay the Petitioner the balance reward as per the Reward Policy within three months, after adjusting the advance amount already paid. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259383