https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169800 Collusion in an ejectment suit is not established by the mere fact that lessor and lessee are distinct corporate entities with common directors, that the lessee did not contest the suit, or that the sub-lessee was not impleaded. Collusion requires an improper act or omission for a dishonest or sinister purpose. A landlord's suit for possession against the lessee remains a legitimate enforcement action even if it incidentally affects a sub-lessee. On the facts stated, there was no basis to treat the ex parte decree as a sham or as procured by a dishonest arrangement, and the decree was held to bind the sub-lessee. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2015 11:34:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169800 Collusion in an ejectment suit is not established by the mere fact that lessor and lessee are distinct corporate entities with common directors, that the lessee did not contest the suit, or that the sub-lessee was not impleaded. Collusion requires an improper act or omission for a dishonest or sinister purpose. A landlord's suit for possession against the lessee remains a legitimate enforcement action even if it incidentally affects a sub-lessee. On the facts stated, there was no basis to treat the ex parte decree as a sham or as procured by a dishonest arrangement, and the decree was held to bind the sub-lessee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169800