<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259368</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against CESTAT&#039;s decision, challenging duty evasion and penalty imposition on the assessee, was dismissed. The Court emphasized the importance of factual evidence, the relevance of past cases, and the need for independent assessment in duty evasion matters. The dismissal was based on the lack of substantial legal issues in CESTAT&#039;s decision, with the Court finding the evidence and legal grounds insufficient to overturn the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259368</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against CESTAT&#039;s decision, challenging duty evasion and penalty imposition on the assessee, was dismissed. The Court emphasized the importance of factual evidence, the relevance of past cases, and the need for independent assessment in duty evasion matters. The dismissal was based on the lack of substantial legal issues in CESTAT&#039;s decision, with the Court finding the evidence and legal grounds insufficient to overturn the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>