<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259354</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the imposition of the penalty was not justified based on the circumstances and facts of the case, particularly concerning the characterization of losses and the interpretation of relevant provisions regarding commodity derivatives traded on stock exchanges. The Court set aside the penalty imposed by the ITAT, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 08:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259354</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the imposition of the penalty was not justified based on the circumstances and facts of the case, particularly concerning the characterization of losses and the interpretation of relevant provisions regarding commodity derivatives traded on stock exchanges. The Court set aside the penalty imposed by the ITAT, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>