https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169797 A later statute excluding limitation for wakf property suits does not revive a claim already barred under the earlier limitation law unless the enactment clearly provides retrospective effect. Section 107 of the Wakf Act was treated as excluding the Limitation Act, 1963 for wakf disputes, but not as reopening claims whose remedy and title had already been extinguished. Section 112 was regarded as a saving provision, not a source of retrospectivity. On the facts found, the plea of adverse possession against the wakf properties also failed, and the concurrent finding that the properties were wakf properties remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169797 A later statute excluding limitation for wakf property suits does not revive a claim already barred under the earlier limitation law unless the enactment clearly provides retrospective effect. Section 107 of the Wakf Act was treated as excluding the Limitation Act, 1963 for wakf disputes, but not as reopening claims whose remedy and title had already been extinguished. Section 112 was regarded as a saving provision, not a source of retrospectivity. On the facts found, the plea of adverse possession against the wakf properties also failed, and the concurrent finding that the properties were wakf properties remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169797