<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the addition of the expenditure incurred on advertisements for popularizing yellow page directories. The Tribunal held that the expenditure was revenue in nature, akin to advertisement expenses, and did not provide enduring benefit to the assessee. The decision was based on the nature of the expenditure and previous precedents where similar expenses were treated as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 11:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the addition of the expenditure incurred on advertisements for popularizing yellow page directories. The Tribunal held that the expenditure was revenue in nature, akin to advertisement expenses, and did not provide enduring benefit to the assessee. The decision was based on the nature of the expenditure and previous precedents where similar expenses were treated as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>