<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 205 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259331</link>
    <description>The appellate order was set aside for a legal infirmity regarding the absence of notice for the enhancement of penalty. The appeals were allowed, stay applications disposed of, and no remand was necessary for further notice issuance for retrial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 07:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 205 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259331</link>
      <description>The appellate order was set aside for a legal infirmity regarding the absence of notice for the enhancement of penalty. The appeals were allowed, stay applications disposed of, and no remand was necessary for further notice issuance for retrial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>