<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalty imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 15A of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that the bill of entry was a valid document for availing cenvat credit, in line with previous legal precedents. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor based on the specific circumstances of the case and established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalty imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 15A of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that the bill of entry was a valid document for availing cenvat credit, in line with previous legal precedents. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor based on the specific circumstances of the case and established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>