<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259295</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the tax levy imposed by the respondent, leading to the petitioner seeking a refund of excess tax paid. The court found that the delay in refund was not intentional and directed the petitioner to collect the refund without additional interest, as the excess tax collection was a result of the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259295</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the tax levy imposed by the respondent, leading to the petitioner seeking a refund of excess tax paid. The court found that the delay in refund was not intentional and directed the petitioner to collect the refund without additional interest, as the excess tax collection was a result of the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>