https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259285 The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue for the demand of the differential customs duty and penalty imposition due to undervaluation of imported betel nuts. The issue of time-barred claims was deferred for consideration at the final hearing. The evidence, although not entirely accurate, was deemed adequate to establish undervaluation. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50,00,000/- to proceed with the appeal, despite claiming financial difficulties. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2015 07:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259285 The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue for the demand of the differential customs duty and penalty imposition due to undervaluation of imported betel nuts. The issue of time-barred claims was deferred for consideration at the final hearing. The evidence, although not entirely accurate, was deemed adequate to establish undervaluation. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50,00,000/- to proceed with the appeal, despite claiming financial difficulties. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259285