<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to work out the peak amount for an addition vague and unsustainable. It concluded that the AO&#039;s additions lacked a justified basis and incriminating material, rendering them unsupportable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 07:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to work out the peak amount for an addition vague and unsustainable. It concluded that the AO&#039;s additions lacked a justified basis and incriminating material, rendering them unsupportable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>