<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259262</link>
    <description>Admitted contemporaneous statements and an admitted register can sustain a demand where finished goods shortage is established and later retraction is uncorroborated. The demand based on shortage of finished goods and the Daily Progress Report Register was therefore upheld. By contrast, shortage of raw materials alone did not prove clandestine removal, because no reliable evidence showed that the inputs were diverted or not consumed in manufacture and one-to-one input-output correlation was not required in a CENVAT setting. The demand on raw material shortage was set aside. On the facts found, the Director&#039;s personal penalty and confiscation with redemption fine were not warranted and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 07:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259262</link>
      <description>Admitted contemporaneous statements and an admitted register can sustain a demand where finished goods shortage is established and later retraction is uncorroborated. The demand based on shortage of finished goods and the Daily Progress Report Register was therefore upheld. By contrast, shortage of raw materials alone did not prove clandestine removal, because no reliable evidence showed that the inputs were diverted or not consumed in manufacture and one-to-one input-output correlation was not required in a CENVAT setting. The demand on raw material shortage was set aside. On the facts found, the Director&#039;s personal penalty and confiscation with redemption fine were not warranted and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>