<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the principal manufacturer is not liable to pay duty on waste and scrap generated at the job workers&#039; end, even if job charges include the value of waste and scrap. The duty on scrap generated and sold by job workers cannot be imposed on the principal manufacturer, as the job worker is considered the manufacturer of waste and scrap under the Central Excise Rules. Therefore, the appellant was not required to pay duty on waste and scrap generated at the job workers&#039; end, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 07:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the principal manufacturer is not liable to pay duty on waste and scrap generated at the job workers&#039; end, even if job charges include the value of waste and scrap. The duty on scrap generated and sold by job workers cannot be imposed on the principal manufacturer, as the job worker is considered the manufacturer of waste and scrap under the Central Excise Rules. Therefore, the appellant was not required to pay duty on waste and scrap generated at the job workers&#039; end, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>