<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 126 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259252</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned order on entertainment tax assessment. The court found that the petitioner was not provided with a proper opportunity as no show cause notice was issued before the order. The matter was remanded to the Mamlatdar for a fresh decision, treating the previous order as a show cause notice. The petitioner was given two weeks to respond, and the prosecution matter was concluded by allowing the petitioner to compound the offense by paying the required amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 07:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 126 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259252</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned order on entertainment tax assessment. The court found that the petitioner was not provided with a proper opportunity as no show cause notice was issued before the order. The matter was remanded to the Mamlatdar for a fresh decision, treating the previous order as a show cause notice. The petitioner was given two weeks to respond, and the prosecution matter was concluded by allowing the petitioner to compound the offense by paying the required amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>