<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 119 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259245</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted on two issues: the classification of the sales tax exemption amount and the deduction of contributions to staff clubs. The court dismissed the appeal on the other five issues, including the nature of expenditure on termination of a BOOT contract and the classification of reactor relocation expenses. The court emphasized the importance of consistent factual positions and adherence to settled legal principles in its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 119 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259245</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted on two issues: the classification of the sales tax exemption amount and the deduction of contributions to staff clubs. The court dismissed the appeal on the other five issues, including the nature of expenditure on termination of a BOOT contract and the classification of reactor relocation expenses. The court emphasized the importance of consistent factual positions and adherence to settled legal principles in its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>