<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169784</link>
    <description>In Civil Appeal No. 1208 of 1990, the court dismissed the appeal, determining that &#039;Sterling Castle&#039; was not Ripudaman Singh&#039;s personal property but belonged to Nabha State. In Civil Appeal No. 5857 of 1983, the court allowed the appeal, establishing that House No. 34, Alipur Road was Nabha State&#039;s property, not Ripudaman Singh&#039;s personal property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 16:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169784</link>
      <description>In Civil Appeal No. 1208 of 1990, the court dismissed the appeal, determining that &#039;Sterling Castle&#039; was not Ripudaman Singh&#039;s personal property but belonged to Nabha State. In Civil Appeal No. 5857 of 1983, the court allowed the appeal, establishing that House No. 34, Alipur Road was Nabha State&#039;s property, not Ripudaman Singh&#039;s personal property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>