<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 863 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169782</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of all lower courts and decreed the suit for redemption. The appellants were granted the right to redeem the usufructory mortgage and obtain possession of the shop by depositing Rs. 1000 in the trial court within three months. The defendant was instructed to produce the mortgage deed for cancellation and restore possession upon the deposit. Costs were quantified at Rs. 5000 in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 863 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169782</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of all lower courts and decreed the suit for redemption. The appellants were granted the right to redeem the usufructory mortgage and obtain possession of the shop by depositing Rs. 1000 in the trial court within three months. The defendant was instructed to produce the mortgage deed for cancellation and restore possession upon the deposit. Costs were quantified at Rs. 5000 in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>